The US Navy (USN) should “establish and implement procedures to collect and analyse reliable maintenance data” and “include the performance of intermediate maintenance periods in strategic planning efforts”, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended in a report released on 9 February.

“The navy collected, but did not analyse, limited data on the performance of intermediate maintenance periods – work often occurring while a ship is pierside and capable of getting under way within 96 hours,” the GAO said in its report, ‘Navy Ship Maintenance: Actions Needed to Monitor and Address the Performance of Intermediate Maintenance Periods'.

The US Navy (USN) should “establish and implement procedures to collect and analyse reliable maintenance data” and “include the performance of intermediate maintenance periods in strategic planning efforts”, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended in a report released on 9 February.

“The navy collected, but did not analyse, limited data on the performance of intermediate maintenance periods – work often occurring while a ship is pierside and capable of getting under way within 96 hours,” the GAO said in its report, ‘Navy Ship Maintenance: Actions Needed to Monitor and Address the Performance of Intermediate Maintenance Periods'.

The US Navy (USN) should “establish and implement procedures to collect and analyse reliable maintenance data” and “include the performance of intermediate maintenance periods in strategic planning efforts”, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended in a report released on 9 February.

“The navy collected, but did not analyse, limited data on the performance of intermediate maintenance periods – work often occurring while a ship is pierside and capable of getting under way within 96 hours,” the GAO said in its report, ‘Navy Ship Maintenance: Actions Needed to Monitor and Address the Performance of Intermediate Maintenance Periods'.

The US Navy (USN) should “establish and implement procedures to collect and analyse reliable maintenance data” and “include the performance of intermediate maintenance periods in strategic planning efforts”, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended in a report released on 9 February.

“The navy collected, but did not analyse, limited data on the performance of intermediate maintenance periods – work often occurring while a ship is pierside and capable of getting under way within 96 hours,” the GAO said in its report, ‘Navy Ship Maintenance: Actions Needed to Monitor and Address the Performance of Intermediate Maintenance Periods'.

The US Navy (USN) should “establish and implement procedures to collect and analyse reliable maintenance data” and “include the performance of intermediate maintenance periods in strategic planning efforts”, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended in a report released on 9 February.

“The navy collected, but did not analyse, limited data on the performance of intermediate maintenance periods – work often occurring while a ship is pierside and capable of getting under way within 96 hours,” the GAO said in its report, ‘Navy Ship Maintenance: Actions Needed to Monitor and Address the Performance of Intermediate Maintenance Periods'.

The US Navy (USN) should “establish and implement procedures to collect and analyse reliable maintenance data” and “include the performance of intermediate maintenance periods in strategic planning efforts”, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended in a report released on 9 February.

“The navy collected, but did not analyse, limited data on the performance of intermediate maintenance periods – work often occurring while a ship is pierside and capable of getting under way within 96 hours,” the GAO said in its report, ‘Navy Ship Maintenance: Actions Needed to Monitor and Address the Performance of Intermediate Maintenance Periods'.