Janes - News page

Know the threat

Impartial perspective on military capabilities, terrorism and insurgency and chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats.

Know the location

Build a clear picture for military operations or market knowledge through smart geospatial layers.

Know the opportunity

Trusted, connected data and unique insight that enables growth in a complex and reshaping industry.

Know the detail

Connected, structured equipment data that delivers unique insights.

USMC continues Iron Dome evaluation, no outstanding cybersecurity or integration challenges

US Army leaders have cited cybersecurity and compatibility concerns as chief reasons not to move forward with integrating Rafael’s Iron Dome mobile, short-range air-defence system into their Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) architecture. The US Marine Corps (USMC), however, is moving forward with plans to integrate Iron Dome components into its medium-range intercept capability, and said its effort is not being hampered by similar concerns.

In 2019, the army inked a deal to purchase two Iron Dome batteries when lawmakers included a provision in the John McCain National Defense Authorization Act of fiscal year 2019 (FY 2019) requiring the service to purchase four batteries to fill an interim, cruise missile defence capability gap. Since then, the service has cited a variety of reasons against fielding the system and purchasing two additional systems. Such concerns have included that the Iron Dome may not defeat the entire cruise missile threat, associated integration challenges, a lack of information from the vendor, and cybersecurity concerns. Army criticisms and concerns, however, are in sharp contrast to the USMC’s experience with the vendor and its evaluation plans.

Currently, the USMC Program Manager Ground Based Air Defense (PM GBAD) is continuing to evaluate ways to integrate Iron Dome components with service capabilities to provide a medium-range intercept capability, USMC spokesperson Barbara Hamby told Jane’s on 9 March. As part of the effort, the PM GBAD is conducting “rigorous” engineering and modeling and simulation activities to support “potential acquisition decisions in the near-term, as well as inform design considerations for future test events”.

When asked if the USMC has any outstanding cybersecurity concerns with using the system or if it has encountered any challenges obtaining information from the contractor, Hamby said that was not the case.

A Tamir missile shown launching from the US Army’s new air-defence platform, the IFPC 2-Intercept multi-mission launcher. The USMC is moving forward with plans to integrate Iron Dome components, including the Tamir missile, into its medium-range intercept capability but the army said it has a variety of concerns and will now host a “shoot off’ for its IFPC Inc 2 effort.

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/2020/05/15/df80542b-fd30-4cd3-8e1a-8348370a9620

US Army leaders have cited cybersecurity and compatibility concerns as chief reasons not to move for...

USMC continues Iron Dome evaluation, no outstanding cybersecurity or integration challenges

US Army leaders have cited cybersecurity and compatibility concerns as chief reasons not to move forward with integrating Rafael’s Iron Dome mobile, short-range air-defence system into their Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) architecture. The US Marine Corps (USMC), however, is moving forward with plans to integrate Iron Dome components into its medium-range intercept capability, and said its effort is not being hampered by similar concerns.

In 2019, the army inked a deal to purchase two Iron Dome batteries when lawmakers included a provision in the John McCain National Defense Authorization Act of fiscal year 2019 (FY 2019) requiring the service to purchase four batteries to fill an interim, cruise missile defence capability gap. Since then, the service has cited a variety of reasons against fielding the system and purchasing two additional systems. Such concerns have included that the Iron Dome may not defeat the entire cruise missile threat, associated integration challenges, a lack of information from the vendor, and cybersecurity concerns. Army criticisms and concerns, however, are in sharp contrast to the USMC’s experience with the vendor and its evaluation plans.

Currently, the USMC Program Manager Ground Based Air Defense (PM GBAD) is continuing to evaluate ways to integrate Iron Dome components with service capabilities to provide a medium-range intercept capability, USMC spokesperson Barbara Hamby told Jane’s on 9 March. As part of the effort, the PM GBAD is conducting “rigorous” engineering and modeling and simulation activities to support “potential acquisition decisions in the near-term, as well as inform design considerations for future test events”.

When asked if the USMC has any outstanding cybersecurity concerns with using the system or if it has encountered any challenges obtaining information from the contractor, Hamby said that was not the case.

A Tamir missile shown launching from the US Army’s new air-defence platform, the IFPC 2-Intercept multi-mission launcher. The USMC is moving forward with plans to integrate Iron Dome components, including the Tamir missile, into its medium-range intercept capability but the army said it has a variety of concerns and will now host a “shoot off’ for its IFPC Inc 2 effort.

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/2020/05/15/df80542b-fd30-4cd3-8e1a-8348370a9620

US Army leaders have cited cybersecurity and compatibility concerns as chief reasons not to move for...

More sea news

USMC continues Iron Dome evaluation, no outstanding cybersecurity or integration challenges

US Army leaders have cited cybersecurity and compatibility concerns as chief reasons not to move forward with integrating Rafael’s Iron Dome mobile, short-range air-defence system into their Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) architecture. The US Marine Corps (USMC), however, is moving forward with plans to integrate Iron Dome components into its medium-range intercept capability, and said its effort is not being hampered by similar concerns.

In 2019, the army inked a deal to purchase two Iron Dome batteries when lawmakers included a provision in the John McCain National Defense Authorization Act of fiscal year 2019 (FY 2019) requiring the service to purchase four batteries to fill an interim, cruise missile defence capability gap. Since then, the service has cited a variety of reasons against fielding the system and purchasing two additional systems. Such concerns have included that the Iron Dome may not defeat the entire cruise missile threat, associated integration challenges, a lack of information from the vendor, and cybersecurity concerns. Army criticisms and concerns, however, are in sharp contrast to the USMC’s experience with the vendor and its evaluation plans.

Currently, the USMC Program Manager Ground Based Air Defense (PM GBAD) is continuing to evaluate ways to integrate Iron Dome components with service capabilities to provide a medium-range intercept capability, USMC spokesperson Barbara Hamby told Jane’s on 9 March. As part of the effort, the PM GBAD is conducting “rigorous” engineering and modeling and simulation activities to support “potential acquisition decisions in the near-term, as well as inform design considerations for future test events”.

When asked if the USMC has any outstanding cybersecurity concerns with using the system or if it has encountered any challenges obtaining information from the contractor, Hamby said that was not the case.

A Tamir missile shown launching from the US Army’s new air-defence platform, the IFPC 2-Intercept multi-mission launcher. The USMC is moving forward with plans to integrate Iron Dome components, including the Tamir missile, into its medium-range intercept capability but the army said it has a variety of concerns and will now host a “shoot off’ for its IFPC Inc 2 effort.

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/2020/05/15/df80542b-fd30-4cd3-8e1a-8348370a9620

US Army leaders have cited cybersecurity and compatibility concerns as chief reasons not to move for...

Request Consultation
Thank you for your inquiry, a Janes representative will be in contact with you shortly. Loading animation

Request a free consultation to find out how in a world of fake news and ever growing conflict, Janes can provide you with unbiased, verified open-source intelligence.

News Janes | The latest defence and security news from Janes - the trusted source for defence intelligence