skip to main content
By Pat Host |

‘Lack of final quality check' drove F-35 non-conforming spare part problem

News
Share:
An F-35A begins a practice flight on 29 July 2020 at Hill AFB Utah. A former F-35 official said Lockheed Martin has had a poor spare part delivery rate since 2015 because the company was not performing a final quality check before the parts were delive...

Lockheed Martin had a high rate of delivering non-ready-for-issue (RFI), or installation, spare parts for the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) within the last five years because part suppliers were sending spare parts directly to the field and not the prime contractor, according to a former F-35 programme official.

Speaking under conditions of anonymity, the former official told Janes on 4 August that Lockheed Martin had a final check of production parts, but not spare parts, being delivered for the F-35. The prime contractor would take delivery of production parts at one of its three final assembly and check-out (FACO) facilities to ensure that parts conformed with its electronic equipment logbook (EEL). If production parts were non-conforming, Lockheed Martin would fix them and make them RFI.

An F-35A begins a practice flight on 29 July 2020 at Hill AFB Utah. A former F-35 official said Lockheed Martin has had a poor spare part delivery rate since 2015 because the company was not performing a final quality check before the parts were delivered. (US Air National Guard)

An F-35A begins a practice flight on 29 July 2020 at Hill AFB Utah. A former F-35 official said Lockheed Martin has had a poor spare part delivery rate since 2015 because the company was not performing a final quality check before the parts were delivered. (US Air National Guard)

The former official said that the first time an opportunity arose to verify that a spare part conformed was when it was delivered to the field and a maintainer logged it into the F-35’s Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS). This is when a maintainer would discover that the EEL was not right and thus the part was not RFI.

“The spare parts were getting directly to [maintainers] before there was a final check of the EELs, which I squarely blame on Lockheed Martin,” the former official said. “Lockheed Martin is responsible for the integrity of its supply chain.”

Go beyond the headlines - with direct links to interconnected entities

Get full access to validated equipment, military capabilities, and market insights.

Never miss updated intel from Janes.

Move faster with human-validated intelligence.

Get equipment and weapon intelligence that’s human-validated, connected, and ready for your mission workflow.

Message Received!

Message received. Thank you for getting in touch, our team will reach out to you soon.


In the meantime... check out our OSINT insights