CBRN Assessment

Experts warn of 'Chernobyl' risk at Yongbyon nuclear plant

26 January 2014
Satellite imagery taken in May 2013 of the Yongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Centre in North Korea. (IHS/DigitalGlobe)

North Korea's decision to restart its 5 megawatt electric (MWe) reactor at the Yongbyon nuclear scientific research complex threatens Northeast Asia with a disaster potentially worse than Chernobyl, according to nuclear experts.

"This reactor comes from another world. The Yongbyon site has a concentration of so many nuclear facilities that if there was a fire in one building it could lead to a disaster worse than the Ukrainian one," said Seo Kyun Reul, a professor at the nucleonic department of Seoul National University.

Yongbyon's 5 MWe reactor uses obsolete magnox technology that, combined with the reuse of old graphite moderators, greatly increases the risk of a fire, Seo said.

Magnox technology uses graphite instead of water to moderate neutrons. It was held responsible for the 1957 accident in the UK when the Unit 1 reactor at Windscale (now Sellafield) caught fire and released radioactive contaminants into the surrounding area. Similarly, it was an explosion and subsequent fire at Chernobyl that helped release large quantities of radioactive particles into the atmosphere.

"Graphite loves to burn. All the countries that used it faced a fire issue at some point," said Peter Hayes of the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. "The safety issue in Yongbyon is straightforward - the graphite moderator catches fire, and you have a perfect storm: a fire with powerful thermal plume carrying contents high into the sky."

Seo said that in a fire engineers were likely to lose control of the reactor, triggering a disastrous chain reaction. Rising temperature and pressure would lead to an explosion, projecting radioactive particles high into the atmosphere, as happened in Chernobyl.

Soviet doctrine is thought to have informed much of North Korea's capabilities and although the North Koreans are likely to have examined the Chernobyl disaster, it is unclear whether they have incorporated any lessons learned into current doctrine, training and operations. Most analysts think it is unlikely that they have the resources to effectively control a fire or any subsequent radiation.

Depending on the wind direction, the radioactive plume could threaten the population of Pyongyang, which is only 85 km away, or Siberia and northern Japan. Seoul, which is only 300 km south, could also be impacted.

Pyongyang announced in April 2013 that it would restart the 5 MWe reactor, which had been closed under an agreement reached at the six-party talks in 2007. Satellite imagery published in August 2013 suggested that operations had resumed at the site. This was confirmed by Nam Jae-joon, the director of South Korea's National Intelligence Service, on 8 October 2013.



(424 words)
By posting a comment you confirm that you have read and accept our Posting Rules and our Terms of Use of this site.

RELEVANT PROFILE LISTINGS

  • Spitzer (Space Infrared Telescope Facility/SIRTF)

    Current status SIRTF was launched on 25 August 2003 (GMT). Renamed Spitzer after launch, it entered standby mode at 22:11 GMT on 15 May 2009, as a result of running out of liquid helium coolant. This meant that the longer wavelength multiband imaging photometer and infrared spectrograph instruments

  • CAM (Chemical Agent Monitor)

    Development The Smiths Detection CAM (Chemical Agent Monitor) is a hand-held instrument used to warn of the presence of Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) vapours. The first CAMs were produced in the mid-1980s since which time a continuous programme of product improvements has taken place. Several

  • Chandra X-Ray Observatory (Advanced X-ray Astrophysics Facility - AXAF)

    Current status Chandra was launched on 23 July 1999. It is still operational, despite some degradation to the ACIS detectors, and the continuation of the mission until at least 2016 has been recommended. Chandra is still the most powerful X-ray telescope ever orbited. Background NASA renamed the

  • General Dynamics Land Systems M1/M1A1/M1A2 Abrams MBT

    Development The XM1 battle tank programme was established in December 1971 and in February the following year the US Army activated a task force with the user, trainer and developer participating to formulate the concept for the new battle tank. This report was published in August 1972 and the

  • Oko (US-KMO / US-KS / US-K) constellation

    Current status The long-serving Oko (Eye) early warning constellation continued in service until June 2014, when it was reported that contact had been lost with Kosmos-2479, leaving Russia with no operational early warning satellites of this type. There have been 86 Oko satellite launches to highly

ADVERTISEMENT

Industry Links

IHS Jane's is not responsible for the content within or linking from Industry Links pages.
ADVERTISEMENT