DAPA reveals ‘Korea Defense Capability' policy

by Jon Grevatt Sep 14, 2021, 09:20 AM

South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) has disclosed to Janes details about a new industry policy that will shape the way it engages with...

Janes Defence Budgets forecasts that South Korea will increase funding for military procurement by about USD1 billion over the coming five years. (Janes Defence Budgets)

South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) has disclosed to Janes details about a new industry policy that will shape the way it engages with foreign contractors.

DAPA said its Korea Defense Capability (KDC) programme will prioritise local sourcing through industrial co-operation projects linked to defence contracts.

The objective of the plan is to spur local industrial capability and enhance the supply of equipment and services to the Republic of Korea (RoK) Armed Forces.

In comments to Janes , DAPA compared the new policy to the US' Buy American Act, Canberra's Australian Industry Capability (AIC) scheme, and New Delhi's ‘Make in India' initiative.

Like in India, South Korea's KDC policy will operate alongside the country's existing defence offset guidelines, which were most recently updated in March 2020.

A spokesperson for DAPA said the KDC policy was put in place in August. “Korea Defense Capability promotes the acquisition of home-grown military equipment and the use of South Korean parts for the purpose of strengthening the competitiveness of the domestic defence industry,” said the spokesperson.

“[The KDC policy also] lays the foundation for sustainable and win-win co-operation between Korean and foreign defence companies and enhances efficiencies in operating and maintaining military equipment operated by the RoK Armed Forces,” the spokesperson added.

The KDC programme will incorporate several measures to boost the national defence industry. These include targeted budgetary ratios for procurement from local and foreign sources, evaluating the cost of acquisitions by considering total operating life costs, and assessing the economic impact of procurements on national industry.

Already a Janes subscriber? Read the full article via the Client Login
Interested in subscribing, see What we do