Washington debates future Syria policy
2/21/2012
The onslaught is ongoing in Homs, the city at the epicentre of the uprising. This, coupled with Russia and China's veto on 4 February of the UN Security Council resolution calling for Assad to step down, has prompted several US politicians including Senators John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Joseph Lieberman to propose the idea of providing military supplies (arms and communications equipment) to the FSA. While the administration of President Barack Obama is showing no sign of considering such a course of action, the option of providing humanitarian aid to the Syrian people is being discussed at high levels.
There could be benefits for the US in providing military assistance to the FSA. First, it might decrease the bloodshed against civilians by enabling the FSA to better protect them and its members and to mount a more effective insurgency against regime forces. Second, it creates closer contact with the rebels and, should they topple Assad, greater leverage over Syria's future.
160 of 707 wordsMost Viewed Articles
- USN's X-47B headed for first trap landing on board carrier at sea
- The Ford-class aircraft carrier, the future US Navy: Enabling the distributed force
- Russia, US SSBN patrol figures revealed
- Militants improvise MANPADS batteries
- Germany axes Euro Hawk
- US Army trains with SpotterRF's man-portable radar
- IMDEX Asia 2013: Two-ship programme firms up for Indonesian PKR frigate
- UK wraps up UAV experiment
- IDEF 2013: TAI reveals fifth generation fighter designs
- Northrop Grumman tests B-2 anti-jamming satcomms system without USAF's preferred radio
日本














